Factory Payment Terms for Amazon Private Label: 30/70, LC, DP, and DA Explained What the payment structures you'll see from Chinese factories actually mean — and which ones protect you, which protect the factory, and when each applies.
What the payment structures you'll see from Chinese factories actually mean — and which ones protect you, which protect the factory, and when each applies.
When you reach the point of placing a purchase order with a factory, the quote will include a payment terms line that most first-time buyers have never formally learned. Terms like "T/T 30/70" or "LC at sight" or "D/P 60 days" encode real commitments about when your money moves, what protections you have if things go wrong, and who bears the risk at each stage of the transaction. This guide covers the core structures you'll encounter and how to think about them.
T/T stands for Telegraphic Transfer — the standard international bank wire transfer. When a factory quote says "T/T," they mean they want payment via wire transfer (SWIFT or similar). T/T is the method of payment. The fraction that follows specifies the timing.
T/T stands for Telegraphic Transfer — the standard international bank wire transfer. When a factory quote says "T/T," they mean they want payment via wire transfer (SWIFT or similar). T/T is the method of payment. The fraction that follows specifies the timing.
A Letter of Credit (LC) is a fundamentally different structure from T/T. It is not just a different payment timing — it is a bank-backed guarantee that changes who is responsible for the payment commitment. How it works: your bank (issuing bank) issues a formal document promising to pay the factory's bank (advising or confirming bank) when the factory presents.
A Letter of Credit (LC) is a fundamentally different structure from T/T. It is not just a different payment timing — it is a bank-backed guarantee that changes who is responsible for the payment commitment.
How it works: your bank (issuing bank) issues a formal document promising to pay the factory's bank (advising or confirming bank) when the factory presents shipping documents that conform exactly to the LC terms. The LC specifies: product description, quantity, packing requirements, port of loading, port of discharge, latest shipment date, and required documents (commercial invoice, packing list, Bill of Lading, sometimes certificates of origin or inspection reports).
The factory ships, presents the documents to their bank, the bank verifies compliance, and payment is released — typically within 5 banking days. Your obligation to pay is absolute once a complying presentation is made; you cannot withhold payment because you have a dispute with the factory about product quality (that's a separate legal process).
LCs have a real cost: $500–1,500 to issue, plus bank fees on both sides. They also require strict document compliance — any discrepancy between the LC terms and the presented documents (even minor ones, like a date format or a packing description that doesn't exactly match) creates a "discrepant presentation" that can delay payment and generate dispute fees.
For most Amazon sellers, the practical answer is: an LC makes sense when your order value exceeds $50,000–100,000 with a factory you don't yet have full trust in, or when the factory specifically requires one as a condition of the transaction. Below those order sizes, the LC cost as a percentage of the order value is rarely justified by the protection it provides.
Documentary collections are a middle ground between pure T/T (where you trust the factory) and LC (where a bank guarantees payment). In a documentary collection, a bank holds the shipping documents — specifically the Bill of Lading — and releases them to you only when you meet a condition.
Documentary collections are a middle ground between pure T/T (where you trust the factory) and LC (where a bank guarantees payment). In a documentary collection, a bank holds the shipping documents — specifically the Bill of Lading — and releases them to you only when you meet a condition.
The Bill of Lading is the title document for your goods. Without it, you cannot claim your shipment at the port. Whoever holds the Bill of Lading controls the goods.
| Term | When you pay | When you get goods | Factory risk | Common context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T/T 30/70 | 30% now; 70% before shipment | After full payment | Low | Most common; new relationships |
| LC at sight | At shipment (bank-backed) | After LC complies | Very low | Large orders; unfamiliar buyers |
| Usance LC | 30–90 days after shipment | At shipment | Low (bank-backed) | Large orders with credit extension |
| D/P (DP) | At document presentation | After payment | Medium (goods at port) | Established relationship; mid-size orders |
| D/A (DA) | 30–90 days after goods received | On acceptance | High | Trusted, long-term relationships |
| Net-30 after delivery | 30 days after warehouse receipt | On delivery | Very high | Multi-year relationships; volume buyers |
Most Amazon private-label sellers are capital-constrained. Understanding how payment terms interact with your Amazon cash cycle matters for planning inventory. A simplified example: you place a $20,000 order under T/T 30/70 terms with a standard production and shipping timeline.
Most Amazon private-label sellers are capital-constrained. Understanding how payment terms interact with your Amazon cash cycle matters for planning inventory.
A simplified example: you place a $20,000 order under T/T 30/70 terms with a standard production and shipping timeline.
Under this timeline, you have $20,000 out of pocket for 60–90 days before any revenue returns. If you can negotiate T/T 30/70 with the 70% due 30 days after delivery, you shift the full $14,000 payment to day 90–105 — after you've started receiving Amazon payouts. That change alone can be the difference between needing a line of credit and not.
A few patterns that signal risk: A new factory asking for 100% upfront : understandable for very small orders or highly customized work, but a request for 100% T/T upfront on a standard $15,000+ order should prompt additional due diligence.
A few patterns that signal risk:
Payment terms are a function of trust, and trust is built through transaction history. The practical sequence most private-label buyers move through: Orders 1–2 : T/T 30/70 before shipment. No credit; factory takes no payment risk; you prove you pay on time.
Payment terms are a function of trust, and trust is built through transaction history. The practical sequence most private-label buyers move through:
The single most important factor in moving along this progression: pay on time, every time. A buyer with 10 clean payment records can negotiate almost any terms a factory of similar size will offer. A buyer who has disputed payments, paid late, or gone silent during a quality issue loses the relationship capital that makes better terms possible.
Understanding payment terms is part of understanding your real landed cost. Terms affect when your cash leaves, how much capital you need to hold in reserve, and what your exposure is if something goes wrong in transit. For supply chain research purposes, the same Bill of Lading data that appears in ImportYeti records the payment terms negotiated between the factory and the importer — which means import data analysis can sometimes reveal what credit terms major brands are getting, and use that as a signal about supplier relationship depth.